Working With Us

Engagements structured for the actual problem.

Advisory, project-based, embedded, and long-term partnership — the engagement models that fit the transformation stage your business is actually in, not the one the retainer model assumes.

80+

Awards

Markets

16+

Years

Start a conversation

Partnership Options

Choose your model.

Project

Fixed scope, clear deliverables. Perfect for audits, setups, and migrations.

Defined scope & timeline
Fixed pricing
Full documentation
Knowledge transfer

Not every engagement is a retainer.

The dominant agency engagement model — monthly retainer, scope creep, and eventual mutual fatigue — works for a narrow subset of problems. For most of the work we do, it is either too much or not enough. Businesses in a one-time transformation moment need project-based work with a clear exit. Businesses with an in-house team that needs ongoing expertise need advisory. Businesses at a stage where the transformation pace requires more than advisory but less than full outsourcing need an embedded model.

We have four engagement models, and we recommend the one that fits the problem. Advisory: fractional access to our senior practitioners for strategic decisions, team reviews, and escalation support. Project-based: defined scope, defined timeline, defined exit — for audits, transformations, or specific capability builds. Embedded: dedicated senior practitioners working inside your team for a defined period, with training and knowledge-transfer baked into the model. Long-term partnership: the retainer model, reserved for engagements where the scope genuinely warrants sustained full-service execution.

The cleanest engagements start with honest scoping. We often recommend a smaller engagement model than the one that would generate a larger first-year invoice. That discipline is part of why clients stay on for the engagements that do warrant the retainer.

Why Choose Us

What makes the difference.

Advisory

Fractional senior practitioner access for strategic decisions, team reviews, and escalation. For businesses with strong in-house capability that benefits from periodic outside perspective.

Project-Based

Defined scope, defined timeline, defined exit. Audits, transformations, technical implementations, or capability builds with a clean endpoint — not a retainer disguised as a project.

Embedded

Dedicated senior practitioners working inside your team for a defined period. Training, coaching, and knowledge transfer baked in so the capability stays after the engagement ends.

Long-Term Partnership

Full-service execution across one or more disciplines — sustained engagement where the scope genuinely warrants it. The retainer model, reserved for cases where it fits, not defaulted to for every engagement.

Honest Scoping

We recommend the engagement model that fits the problem. Often that is a smaller one than the alternative. The discipline is part of why clients choose us for the engagements where it does fit.

Model Transitions

Engagements frequently start in one model and transition to another as the situation evolves. Project to long-term partnership. Embedded to advisory. The model fits the moment, not the opposite.

How We Work

Finding the right model.

Scoping

Honest discovery of the problem you actually need solved — not the one you initially framed. Most conversations reframe the scope at least once during this phase.

Recommendation

The engagement model that fits the problem. Advisory, project, embedded, or long-term partnership — and the specific structure and timeline within the chosen model.

Contract & Kickoff

Engagement structure documented. Success criteria defined. Kickoff led by the practitioners who will run the work — not by a sales team who will then hand off.

Evolve

Engagements evolve as the situation does. Model transitions happen when they make sense, not when it is contractually convenient.

Featured Case Study

Politikos Shop.

+231%

Revenue

+225%

Transactions

+230%

Ad Spend

New Markets

Read full case study

FAQ

Common questions.

Which engagement model fits my situation?

Depends on what you actually need. In-house team that needs outside expertise for strategic decisions → advisory. Clear project with a defined endpoint → project-based. Transformation work moving faster than your team can own alone → embedded. Sustained full-service execution across multiple disciplines → long-term partnership. The scoping conversation will usually make the answer obvious.

Can we start with a smaller engagement and expand?

Most of our long-term partnerships started as a project or audit. The small engagement is often the best way to work with us before committing to the bigger one — and sometimes the small engagement is genuinely all that is needed.

Do you work with in-house teams or replace them?

Almost always with in-house teams. We augment, train, and coordinate — we do not default to replacing a team that has institutional knowledge we do not. The embedded and advisory models exist specifically to work alongside internal capability.

What happens if our needs change mid-engagement?

The engagement evolves. We have had projects that transitioned into long-term partnerships, long-term partnerships that wound down into advisory, and embedded engagements that shifted into pure execution as the in-house team grew into ownership. The flexibility is part of the model.

Is there a minimum engagement size?

Yes, though it varies by model. Advisory engagements have the lowest floor. Long-term partnerships have the highest. The scoping conversation covers this directly — we do not pretend to run engagements below the size where the work can be done well.

Ready to find the right model?

Let's talk about what you actually need — and the engagement model that fits the problem, not the one that defaults to the biggest invoice.